Halifax Astrologer Qualifications
But I slowly very, very slowly accumulated knowledge about astrology. At some point I lost everything that was dear to me: job, woman, apartment, etc. And I holed up. I did my crab act. And I hit the astrology books. Then I never stopped. From that time on I was studying 20 hours a day — you know the way people always take off.
But there were other influences around me. There was a French-Canadian astrologer, who has since become a very popular maker of annual fortune books, and I used to go and pester him around that time for information. He got fed up. He went on holiday and lent me his books, which I was reading 20 hours a day until I got my own. Montreal has always been astrological. I was going through an old library-a rare book library-and I found an ephemeris done in the middle of the 19th century for local mean noon Montreal time.
Which means it was worthwhile for somebody to publish that ephemeris in the middle of the 19th century.
There were these French-Canadian astrologers doing very old fashioned, divinatory French astrology. There was, of course, a strong North American influence. There were a couple of Germans, doing very rigid cosmobiological sorts of work. And there was at least one Englishman, Michael Pym, who was a very technical, pure, siderealist of the Anglo-Irish sort. I think he was into things like the vertex, solar apex, and all the more technical things. He had a big influence on me. I wish I knew where he was today.
How did you get into the details of it? Maybe even a neurotic reaction. You have to explain a country, which is just as complicated as explaining an individual. But you have to know tons and tons of facts. Mathematics is completely the opposite. There are no facts in mathematics. You just figure things out. And you could do it with a couple of pipe cleaners, or an envelope and pencil, or whatever.
And I find that very restful. I especially did then because it was such a completely different sort of intellectual exercise. Writers, even technical writers like good old Alan Leo, have a lot of sound technical information in some of their books.watch
Home - Halifax Astrologer
But one cannot understand them. You have to translate them into modern terms. At least, I find that I do. And in the course of understanding all these things, I became a mathematician, I guess.
Debunking Astrology: Mars Can’t Influence You
It was more from an inner predilection-an inner need for a change from the kind of intellectual work that I was doing. I started counseling immediately. My clients tended to be my own age, so I saw a lot of people who wanted to know who they were and what they ought to do. And maybe most of my work in the first ten years or so, was involved with that. For one thing, it made me feel better about Geoffrey Dean. Well, aside from being very nice in person, Dean can be a bit of a monster in print.
Have you met him?
You have Successfully Subscribed!
He looks so Saturnine. He looks kind of Irish-almost elf-like. He can be very pleasant to be with. He measures correspondence by the pound. One other thing about Geoffrey that I witnessed during his visit here is very interesting on a personal level: One evening, he launched into the most Neptune-like astrological speculation in the kooky, traditional astrological style the most blue haired old lady style of astrology.
As off-the-wall as you could imagine.
模板:Zodiac date sidereal
He said the craziest things. Well, he does.
And I would have never known that from his writings. I like Dean personally, but I do not always like him in letters and such. And as Charles Jayne insisted on pointing out, he can be unfair to people and ideas. Rupert Sheldrake would be wasted on him. A tremendous worker. What gets me the most about him is his discouraging tone.
We all have prejudices. I think that astrology is going to become rigorous. How did you and Ken Gilman happen to start it? When did that happen? I think he was ready to create, and he did it. But he meant will I send him an article now and then, or give him some ideas.
But it turned out that he wanted an editor. I went and helped him out. I keep on going down and helping him out. So we started in November We have some very technical articles about directions and rectification techniques. We have more cosmological articles, like those by Charles Jayne that we published, and others. We had a good series by Bruce Scofield on Meso-American astrologers. Astrology the vital piece of the big jig-saw has been discarded but not lost. Why isn't astrology part of the mainstream? Why do, otherwise rational, people condemn it without reason?
Does Astrology conflict with mainstream science? Why it is no longer acceptable to say astrology is rubbish on a scientific basis. How Wikipedia has been hijacked by 'guerrilla skeptics' who push an anti-astrology agenda. Scepticism can be used to justify institutional bias even among respected scientists and journals. Was astronomer and mathematician, Johannes Kepler a sceptic or an astrologer or both?
Related axel harvey astrology
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved